Descripción de la implantación y grado de desarrollo de tecnología de comunicación e informática de los equipos de Atención Primaria en los servicios autonómicos de salud en España

  1. Laura Carbajo Martín 1
  2. Remedios Martín Álvarez 2
  3. María Pilar Astier Peña 3
  4. Rafael Rotaeche del Campo 4
  5. Jorge Navarro Pérez 5
  6. Ignacio Párraga Martínez 6
  1. 1 Servicio de Urgencias Área de Gestión Sanitaria Norte de Huelva; Servicio de Coordinación de Sistemas de Información del Servicio Andaluz de Salud
  2. 2 Centro de Atención Primaria Vallcarca-Sant Gervasi. Barcelona
  3. 3 Centro de Salud Universitas, Sector Zaragoza-III. Servicio Aragonés de Salud
  4. 4 Centro de Salud de Alza (San Sebastián) OSI Donostia. Osakidetza
  5. 5 Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia; INCLIVA, Universitat de València
  6. 6 Centro de Salud Zona VIII de Albacete. Gerencia de Atención Integrada de Albacete. Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (España); Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia

ISSN: 2386-8201

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 14

Issue: 2

Pages: 71-80

Type: Article

DOI: 10.55783/RCMF.140206 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia

Abstract

Objective. To report Primary Care healthcare professionals’ circumstances, insight and points of view in regard to telecommunication systems and telemedicine as well as determine their degree of satisfaction. Method. Descriptive, observational, transversal study performed on primary healthcare professionals by means of a self-completion questionnaire with socio-demographic variables, job characteristics, views and perceptions in regard to IT development, information systems, online accessibility, patient safety and the degree of satisfaction of healthcare professionals with IT development. Results. The results showed that it is possible to access discharge reports from hospitalized patients and from the accident and emergency department in 89.2% (95%CI: 86.4-92.0) and 87.2% (95%CI: 84.2-90.2) of cases, respectively. According to 95.1% of people polled, there is an option for remote consultation with hospital care. A total of 38.9% of survey respondents pointed out that they receive e-notifications of hospital reports and 73.3% claimed to have online access to their patients’ information. A total of 34.8% and 51.7% of clinicians stated that, in general, there was no improvement in communication channels or technological resources after the pandemic, respectively. A total of 13.0% of respondents expressed that they are very unsatisfied and 27.3% unsatisfied with IT development in primary healthcare telemedicine systems and telecommunication in their health area. Conclusion. Most Primary Care healthcare teams in regional health services have access to medical histories shared with hospitals. However, just some of them have electronic notification systems for hospital reports. The mandatory change in healthcare has not substantially improved technological resources after the pandemic and there is a considerable level of dissatisfaction among professionals.

€ View funding

Funding information

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Antonio MG, Petrovskaya O, Lau F. The State of Evidence in Patient Portals: Umbrella Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(11):e23851.
  • Biagetti B, Aulinas A, Dalama B, Nogués R, Zafón C, Mesa J. Communication Between Primary Care and Physician Specialist: Is It Improving? Rev Calid Asist. 2015; 30(4):175-81.
  • Blease C, Bernstein MH, Gaab J, Kaptchuk TJ, Kossowsky J, Mandl KD, et al. Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK. PLoS One. 2018; 13(12):e0207418.
  • Braun RP, Saurat JH. Telemedicina y dermatología. [Internet.] 2001 [consultado: 13 de octubre de 2020];92(9):422-4. Disponible en: https://www.actasdermo.org/es-telemedicina-dermatologia-articulo-13017975?ref=busqueda&ant=13073535&sig=S0001731018303405
  • Briffault X, Morgiève M, Courtet P. From e-Health to i-Health: Prospective Reflexions on the Use of Intelligent Systems in Mental Health Care. Brain Sci. 2018; 8(6):e98.
  • Bunn F, Byrne G, Kendall S. The effects of telephone consultation and triage on healthcare use and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice. 2005; 55(521):956-61.
  • Busca P, Marrón R. La informatización en urgencias y emergencias. Anales Sis San Navarra. [Internet.] 2010 [consultado: 18 de abril de 2021];33(Suppl 1): 69-76. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1137-66272010000200009&lng=es.
  • Cernadas A, Bouzas R, Mesa A, Barral B. Opinión de los facultativos y usuarios sobre avances de la e-salud en atención primaria. Aten Primaria. 2020; 52(6):389-99.
  • Cimino JJ. Putting the «why» in «EHR»: capturing and coding clinical cognition. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019; 26(11):1379-84.
  • Echeverri D. Entre guerras y pandemias. ¿Volveremos a ser los mismos? ¿Hay duda de la resiliencia de la humanidad? [Internet.] 2020 [consultado: 23 de diciembre de 2020]; 27(2):73-6. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271840/
  • Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(2):e20.
  • Flodgren G, Rachas A, Farmer AJ, Inzitari M, Shepperd S. Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. [Internet.] 2015 [consultado 24 de mayo de 2020];9. Disponible en: https://www. cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002098.pub2/full
  • Flores R, Donoso R, Anguita R. Management of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Telemedicine and Network Integration. Rev Med Chil. 2019; 147(4):444-50.
  • Frandsen BR, Joynt KE, Rebitzer JB, Jha AK. Care fragmentation, quality, and costs among chronically ill patients. Am J Manag Care. 2015; 21(5):355-62.
  • Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. [Internet.] Ginebra: World Health Organization; 2021. [Consultado: 18 de abril de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/ docs/default-source/documents/gs4dhdaa2a9f352b0445bafbc79ca799dce4d.pdf?sfvrsn=f112ede5_48
  • Gomes-de Almeida S, Marabujo T, Do Carmo-Gonçalves M. Grado de satisfacción de los pacientes de la Unidad de Salud Familiar Vitrius con la teleconsulta durante la pandemia del COVID-19 [Telemedicine satisfaction of primary care patients during COVID-19 pandemics]. Semergen. 2021; S1138-3593(21)00056-3.
  • Gómez Barrado JJ, Gómez-Turégano P, Ortiz-Cortés C, Lezcano-Gort LE, Kounka Z, Romero-Castro MJ. Communication Between Levels of Care: An Opportunity for Improvement in Cardiovascular Prevention. Clínica e investigación en Arteriosclerosis. 2019; 31(5):222-7.
  • Gómez Martino JR, Suárez Santisteban MA, Gallego Domínguez S, Castellano Cerviño I, Covarsi Rojas A. ¿Es el momento de aplicar las nuevas tecnologías de la información y comunicación a la nefrología? [Internet.] 2008 [consultado: 10 de octubre de 2020]; 28(4):365-8. Disponible en: https://www.revistanefrologia.com/es-es-el-momento-deaplicar-articulo-X0211699508005352?ref
  • IAB Academy. IAB. [Internet.] 2020 [consultado el 18 Abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://iabspain.es/.
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística. España en cifras 2019. Madrid: INE; 2019.
  • Jiang LC, Wang Z, Peng T, Zhu J. The divided communities of shared concerns: Mapping the intellectual structure of e-Health research in social science journals. Int J Med Inform. 2015; 84:24-35.
  • Krynski L, Golfarb G, Maglio I. Technology-mediated Communication with Patients: WhatsApp Messenger, E-Mail, Patient Portals. A Challenge for Pediatricians in the Digital Era. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2018; 116(4):e554-e559.
  • Leong S, Gingrich D, Lewis P, Mauger D, George J. Enhancing doctor-patient communication using email: A pilot study J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005; 180-88.
  • Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. e-Salud. Informe anual del Sistema Nacional de Salud 2017. [Internet.] Madrid: MSSSI; 2018 [consultado: 21 de febrero de 2019]. Disponible en: https://www. mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/sisInfSanSNS/tablasEstadisticas/InfAnSNS.htm.
  • Murillo C, Saurina C. Medida de la importancia de las dimensiones de la satisfacción en la provisión de servicios de salud. Gac Sanit. 2013; 27:304-9
  • Romero G, De Argila D, Ferrandiz L, Sánchez D, Vañó S, Taberner R, et al. Practice Models in Teledermatology in Spain: Longitudinal Study, 2009-2014. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2018; 109(7): 624-30.
  • Ross J, Stevenson F, Lau R, Murray E. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: A systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implement Sci. [Internet.] 2016; 11:146-58. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7.
  • Ruiz-Romero V, Martínez-Pillado M, Torres-Domínguez Y, Acón-Royo D, De Toro-Salas A, Cruz-Villalón F, et al. Evaluación de la satisfacción del paciente en la teleconsulta durante la pandemia por COVID-19 [User satisfaction with telephonic consultations carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic.]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021; 95:e202104054.
  • Sánchez Losada JA, Albarrán J, Romero Sánchez. Análisis médico-legal de la consulta médica telefónica: riesgos legales profesionales. Revista de la Escuela de Medicina Legal. 2010;13(febrero):31-8.
  • Taberner R. e-Dermatology: social networks and other web based tools. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016; 107(2):98-106.
  • Tates K, Antheunis ML, Kanters S, Nieboer TE, Gerritse MB. The effect of screen-toscreen versus face-to-face consultation on doctor-patient communication: An experimental study with simulated patients. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19:e421.
  • Tian PGJ, Harris JR, Seikaly H, Chambers T, Alvarado S, Eurich D. Characteristics and Outcomes of Physician-to-Physician Telephone Consultation Programs: Environmental Scan. JMIR Form Res. 2021; 5(2):e17672. Doi: 10.2196/17672. PMID: 33620325; PMCID: PMC7943336.
  • Velasco L, Urueña A, Castro R, Cadenas S, Seco JA. Perfil sociodemográfico de los internautas. Análisis de datos INE 2020. [Internet]. [Madrid: ONTSI. Red.es. Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital; 2020 [consultado: 17 de junio de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.ontsi.red.es/es/estudios-e-informes/Hogares-y-ciudadanos/perfil-sociodemografico-internautas-ine2020
  • Xyrichis A, Mackintosh NJ, Terblanche M, Bench S, Philippou J, Sandall J. Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): Qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Data base of Systematic Reviews. [Internet.] 2017[consultado: 18 de mayo de 2021]; 11. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012876.
Data source: Dialnet