Descripción de actividad asistencial en las Unidades de Hospitalización a Domicilio de Osakidetza – Servicio Vasco de Salud

  1. Regalado de los Cobos, José 1
  2. Ruiz de Gordoa Campo, Garbiñe 1
  3. Urzay Atucha, Virginia 2
  4. Azkuenaga Cruz, Irune 3
  5. Pacho Beristain, Naider 4
  6. Pascual Fernández, Nieves 5
  1. 1 Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio. OSI Araba. Vitoria-Gasteiz. Araba. España
  2. 2 Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio. OSI Bilbao-Basurto. Bizkaia. España
  3. 3 Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio. OSI Barrualde-Galdakao. Galdakao. Bizkaia. España
  4. 4 Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio. OSI Goierri-Alto Urola. Zumárraga. Gipuzkoa. España
  5. 5 Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio. OSI Bidasoa. Irún. Gipuzkoa. España
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Hospital a Domicilio

ISSN: 2530-5115

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 7

Número: 3

Páginas: 123-136

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Hospital a Domicilio

Resumen

Introduction: Hospitalization at Home (HaH) Units present differences in their content and conditions of care. The Basque HaH Society initiated a research project in 2018 to define useful indicators to compare the activity of teams with different care content. One phase of the project involved recording characteristics of episodes attended and care provided. It is of interest to disclose the results of the registry. Method: Between May 1 and May 31, 2021, 9 Units recorded certain characteristics of the patients seen, as well as type, frequency and duration of visits performed. Descriptive data on these variables are shown for the overall series and for each unit. Results: 1171 episodes and 8363 visits in 14458 stays were analysed (82% of actual stays). On average, 65% of patients received a visit during working days and 42% during non-working days. The percentage of cases in each clinical type varied according to Units: acute pathology between 12 and 48%; palliative care between 20% and 40%; surgical pathology between 2.3 and 30%. There were also differences in age, sex and geographical dispersion. Mortality and hospital referral varied between Units and also between pathologies. The duration of direct care varied between Units from 24.4 to 35.9 min, and the duration of travel for each visit from 11.9 to 25 min, probably related to the type of pathology and geographical dispersion, respectively.Conclusions: There are indeed differences in the content and working conditions of the different HaH Units. It is necessary to analyse how much they influence the activity and outcome measures in order to have adjusted indicators.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Sanroma P, Sampedro I, González CR, Baños MT. Recomendaciones clínicas y procedimientos - Hospitalización Domiciliaria. Santander, España: Fundación Marqués de Valdecilla; 2011. ISBN 978-84-693-5969-3
  • Estrada Cuxart O, Massa Domínguez B, Ponce González MA, Mirón Rubio M, Torres Corts A, Mujal Martínez A, et al.; Sociedad Española de Hospitalización a Domicilio (SEHAD). Proyecto HAD 2020: una propuesta para consolidar la hospitalización a domicilio en España. Hosp Domic. 2017;1(2):93-117. DOI: 10.22585/hospdomic.v1i2.13
  • Cordero-Guevara JA, Parraza-Díez N, Vrotsou K, Machón M, Orruño E, Onaindia‑Ecenarro MJ, et al. Factors associated with the workload of health professionals in hospital at home: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):704. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08100-4
  • Vrotsou K, Orive-Calzada M, González N, Vergara I, Pascual-Fernández N, Guerra-López C, et al. Factores relacionados con la carga de trabajo en hospitalización a domicilio: estudio de consenso Delphi. J Healthc Qual Res. 2022;S2603-6479(22)00075-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2022.09.001
  • Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
  • Duckitt RW, Buxton-Thomas R, Walker J, Cheek E, Bewick V, Venn R, Forni LG. Worthing physiological scoring system: derivation and validation of a physiological early-warning system for medical admissions - An observational, population-based single-centre study. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98(6):769-74. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem097
  • Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-5. PMID: 14258950
  • Miralles R, Sabartés O, Ferrer M, Esperanza A, Llorach I, García-Palleiro P, et al. Development and validation of an instrument to predict probability of home discharge from a geriatric convalescence unit in Spain. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(2):252-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51066.x
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet