ISMAEL DÍEZ DEL VAL-rekin lankidetzan egindako argitalpenak (16)

2024

  1. Predictors of anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy: Results from the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA)

    European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 50, Núm. 6

2023

  1. Correction: Three-year survival and distribution of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from a European randomized clinical trial (Surgical Endoscopy, (2023), 37, 9, (7317-7324), 10.1007/s00464-023-10278-5)

    Surgical Endoscopy

  2. Erratum to “Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue” [Eur J Surg Oncol 49 (5) (May 2023) 974–982](S074879832300032X)(10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.010)

    European Journal of Surgical Oncology

  3. Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue

    European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 49, Núm. 5, pp. 974-982

  4. Three-year survival and distribution of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from a European randomized clinical trial

    Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 37, Núm. 9, pp. 7317-7324

2022

  1. Gastrectomía vertical como técnica quirúrgica en cirugía bariátrica: Análisis de resultados de seguridad y efectividad

    Cirugía española: Organo oficial de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos, Vol. 100, Núm. 2, pp. 88-94

  2. Health related quality of life following open versus minimally invasive total gastrectomy for cancer: Results from a randomized clinical trial

    European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 48, Núm. 3, pp. 553-560

  3. Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study

    British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 109, Núm. 5, pp. 439-449

  4. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit

    Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 164, Núm. 3, pp. 674-684.e5

2021

  1. Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA)

    BJS Open, Vol. 5, Núm. 3

  2. Core outcome set for surgical trials in gastric cancer (GASTROS study): international patient and healthcare professional consensus

    British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 108, Núm. 10, pp. 1216-1224

  3. Correction to: Open versus minimally invasive total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a European randomized trial (Gastric Cancer, (2021), 24, 1, (258-271), 10.1007/s10120-020-01109-w)

    Gastric Cancer

  4. Mortality from esophagectomy for esophageal cancer across low, middle, and high-income countries: An international cohort study

    European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 47, Núm. 6, pp. 1481-1488

  5. Open versus minimally invasive total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a European randomized trial

    Gastric Cancer, Vol. 24, Núm. 1, pp. 258-271

  6. Postoperative outcomes in oesophagectomy with trainee involvement

    BJS Open, Vol. 5, Núm. 6

2015

  1. The IDEAL prospective development study format for reporting surgical innovations. An illustrative case study of robotic oesophagectomy

    International Journal of Surgery, Vol. 19, pp. 104-111