Luis Fernández-LLebrez del Rey-rekin lankidetzan egindako argitalpenak (12)

2015

  1. Management of breech presentation at term: A retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience

    Journal of Perinatology, Vol. 35, Núm. 10, pp. 803-808

  2. Probability of cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version

    International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 131, Núm. 2, pp. 192-195

2014

  1. Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study

    BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 121, Núm. 2, pp. 230-235

2013

  1. Influence of chorionicity in intra-partum management of twin deliveries

    Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 26, Núm. 4, pp. 407-411

  2. Nitrous oxide for analgesia in external cephalic version at term: Prospective comparative study

    Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Vol. 41, Núm. 6, pp. 719-723

2012

  1. Clinical score for the outcome of external cephalic version: A two-phase prospective study

    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 52, Núm. 1, pp. 59-61

  2. Induction at 41 weeks increases the risk of caesarean section in a hospital with a low rate of caesarean sections

    Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 25, Núm. 9, pp. 1716-1718

2011

  1. A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term

    International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

  2. External cephalic version: A review of the evidence

    Current Women's Health Reviews, Vol. 7, Núm. 4, pp. 405-415

  3. Oxytocin versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor after previous cesarean delivery: A retrospective comparative study

    Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey

2009

  1. Análisis del dolor en la versión cefálica externa

    Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, Vol. 52, Núm. 10, pp. 557-561

  2. Does fetal weight estimated by ultrasound really affect the success rate of external cephalic version?

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Vol. 88, Núm. 10, pp. 1101-1106