Factors of disagreement between coaches and players of a high-level basketball team when assessing individual session perceived exertions

  1. Martínez-Santos, Raúl 1
  2. Los Arcos, Asier
  3. Sautu, Luismari
  1. 1 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/052g8jq94

Journal:
Revista de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1132-239X,  1988-5636

Year of publication: 2015

Issue Title: Revista de Psicología del Deporte (Suplemento)

Volume: 24

Issue: 3

Pages: 69-72

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de psicología del deporte

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the concordance between the coaches and the players of a Spanish highlevel female basketball team when evaluating the hardness of practice sessions looking into the factors that could modulate the alleged biases of the coaches. The three staff members severely underestimated the players’ session perceived exertion, which meant that, as a group, they were not capable of planning the desired intensity along the registered period. Furthermore, this study allowed us to detect what aspects of coaching knowledge should deserve more attention with each staff members if we desired less biased judgments about the players’ perceptions, who were the most relevant and common source of bias.

Bibliographic References

  • Abraham, A., Collins, D. and Martindale, R. (2006). The coaching schematic; Validation through expert coach consensus. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(06), 549-564.
  • Brink, M. S., Frencken, W. G. P., Jordet, G. and Lemmink, K. A. (2013). Coaches' and Players' Perceptions of Training Dose; Not a Perfect Match. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 9(3), 497-502.
  • Calahorro, F., Torres-Luque, G. and Lara-Sánc, A. J. (2014). La percepción subjetiva de esfuerzo como herramienta válida para la monitorización de la intensidad del esfuerzo en competición de jóvenes futbolistas. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 14(1), 75-82.
  • Foster, C. (1998). Monitoring training in athletes with reference to overtraining syndrome. Medicine and Science of Sports Exercice, 30(7), 1164-1168.
  • Foster, C., Heimann, K. M., Esten, P. L., Brice, G. and Porcari, J. P. (2001). Differences in perceptions of training by coaches and athletes. South African Journal os Sports Medicine, 8(2), 3-7.
  • R Core team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
  • Rodríguez-Marroyo, J. A., Medina, J., García-López, J., García-Tormo, J. V. and Foster, C. (2014). Correspondence between training load executed by volleyball players and the one observed by coaches. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(6), 1588-1594.
  • Viveiros, L., Costa Caldas, E., Moreira, A., Naakamura, F. Y. and Saldanha Aoki, M. (2011). Training load monitoring in judo: Comparison between the training load intensity planned by the coach and the intensity experienced by the athlete. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 17(4), 266-269.
  • Wallace, L. K., Stlattery, K. M. and Coutts, A. J. (2009). The ecological validity and application of the session-RPE method for quantifying trainning loads in swimming. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(1), 33-38.
Data source: Dialnet